A friend – a single guy – arrived in Florida with a few
dollars in his wallet and no home to go to. By the time I met him, he had a
good job and a place to live, and was actively involved in church. Because of
his past circumstances, he had a heart for the down-and-out, so one day, in the
course of his job delivering electronic equipment, he encountered a man
displaying the ubiquitous “will work for food” sign. My friend stopped and told
the man he would pay him if he would help him unload the truck. The man said,
“Couldn’t you just give me the money?”
Providing for the poor is the duty of the people who aren’t
poor. God does not distinguish between the
deserving poor and the deadbeat poor. There was bound to be abusers of the
system described here but God put it in place for the benefit of those who
could not help themselves. Should we allow a person to go hungry just because
someone else is a scam artist? And if a man is hungry because of his own bad
choices, is he not still hungry? Is
there any record of Jesus saying, “I’ll help you but you have to promise not to
sell the food to buy cigarettes”? Jesus’ charity came with no strings attached.
Read the verse again. Note that God didn’t impose a law that prevented
the farmer from making a profit from his crop. As a matter of fact, what God
required was no hardship at all. The farmer was not going to miss the grain or
the grapes that got left behind in the initial harvest, but it could make all
the difference to a single mom and her kids or an old drunk down on his luck.
And take note of that final, ominous pronouncement: I am the Lord your God. Are you going to argue with him?
|
No comments:
Post a Comment