Throughout history (and in many cultures today), couples
didn’t meet, fall in love, and get married. When Paul says that husbands must
love their wives, he doesn’t make exceptions for those who didn’t get to choose
the women they married, so there is no loophole either for those who claim they
just don’t love each other anymore.
In our culture, we can’t imagine wanting to marry someone we
aren’t “in love with.” We forget that marriage is a legal contract between two
parties. I suppose that we could make feelings part of the vows, therefore
making “falling out of love” grounds for dissolution, but Christian marriages
are held to a higher standard. Earlier in this chapter, wives are instructed to
submit to their husbands as if to the Lord (a whole ‘nother topic of
discussion!) but here, Paul makes it clear what Christ’s definition of love is
and that husbands are required to love their wives like that – no matter how
they feel about it.
I am not
proposing that love as defined by Christ will save all marriages. As in any
legal agreement, there are terms and conditions that are binding on both
parties. One person’s failure to comply can nullify the contract. But in any
relationship between Christians, a third party is involved: Christ.* Love like his puts self last and transforms our expectations and priorities.
And such love is required of all of us, not just husbands and wives.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment